Analysis Of The Perspectives Of Male Students In The Psychology Study Program At Nusa Cendana University On The Concept Of Toxic Masculinity

Maria Paskalita Wea; Revalina Cleopatra Lema; Theresa Atmarita Wendiati Bota; Indra Yohaes Killing

Authors

Maria Paskalita Wea Faculty of Public Health, Psychologist Study Program, Nusa Cendana University
Revalina Cleopatra Lema Faculty of Public Health, Psychologist Study Program, Nusa Cendana University
Theresa Atmarita Wendiati Bota Faculty of Public Health, Psychologist Study Program, Nusa Cendana University
Indra Yohaes Killing Faculty of Public Health, Psychologist Study Program, Nusa Cendana University

Keywords:

perspectives, toxic masculinity, male students.

Abstract

In the midst of society, the phenomenon of toxic masculinity has spread and continues to be a concern today. This study aims to help us see how the perspectives of male students in the Psychology Study Program, Nusa Cendana University regarding the concept of Toxic Masculinity. This research uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. The data collection technique used semi-structured interviews. The participants in this study were 5 male students in the Psychology Study Program, Nusa Cendana University who were selected purposively. The results showed that there is a positive understanding of the various motives or forms of toxic masculinity behavior as a series of social norms that require men to always be strong, have life principles, have social responsibility, not show emotional expression, self-care using skincare, hang out with female friends, and have hobbies that are often associated with women. In addition, the participants also gave advice for men out there to show their feelings without worrying about being judged by the surrounding environment.

References

Abdi, H. (2022, January 31). Pengertian Tanggung Jawab Menurut Para Ahli, Aspek, dan Ciri-cirinya pada Seseorang. Retrieved from liputan6.com: https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/4874533/pengertian-tanggung-jawab-menurut-para-ahli-aspek-dan-ciri-cirinya-pada-seseorang?page=2

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Kupang. (2024). Kota Kupang dalam Angka Kupang Municipality in Figures 2024. Kupang: BPS Kota Kupang.

Drianus, O. (2019). Hegemonic Masculinity: Wacana Relasi Gender dalam Tinjauan Psikologi Sosial. Psychosophia Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity, 1(1), 36–50.

Hermawan, I., & Hidayah, N. (2023). “Toxic Masculinity dan Tantangan Kaum Lelaki dalam Masyarakat Indonesia Modern,” Dimesia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, Vol 12, No. 2, page 171-182.

Heriyanto. (2018). “Thematic Analysis sebagai Metode Menganalisa Data untuk Penelitian Kualitatif,” Anuva Jurnal Kajian Budaya Perpustakaan dan Informasi, Vol. 2, No. 3, page 317-324

Jufanny, D., & Girsang, L. R. M. (2020). “Toxic Masculinity Dalam Sistem Patriarki (Analisis Wacana Kritis Van Dijk Dalam Film “Posesif”),” Jurnal SEMIOTIKA, Vol. 14, No. 1, page 8-3.

Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2020). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, Vol.21, No. 1, Page 3-17.

Ramdani, M. F. F., Putri, A. V. I. C., & Wisesa, P. A. D. (2022). “Realitas Toxic Masculinity di Masyarakat”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS), Vol 1, page 230-235.

Supratiknya, Agustinus. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif Dalam Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Supriyadi, & Prayoga, R. A. (2022). Pengaruh Maskulinitas dan Inovasi Konsumen Terhadap Orientasi Belanja. Prosiding FRIMA (Festival Riset Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Akuntansi), 6681(3), 653–671.

Yudhistira, F. (2017). Toxic Masculinity Dalam Globalisasi Kontemporer: Studi Kasus Toxic Masculinity Di Indonesia.