Generative Phonology in the Digital Literacy Era: An Analysis of Elementary School Students Phonemic Errors in Educational Audio Production

Authors

  • Diah Pahmasari Harahap Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
  • Siti Uswatun Khasanah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
  • Preti Ifrigil Firginia Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

Keywords:

Phonemics, Generative Phonology, Digital Literacy, Student Pronunciation, Elementary Language Learning

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the phonemic errors produced by elementary school students in creating educational audio content using a generative phonology framework and to examine their implications for language learning strategies in the digital literacy era. The research employs a qualitative approach with a literature review method. Data were gathered from various national and international scientific publications related to phonology, phonemic errors, and technology-based learning. The findings indicate that the most frequent phonemic errors include substitution, elision, and epenthesis, influenced by mother tongue interference, low phonological awareness, and the limited availability of digital pronunciation training media. In the context of elementary education, these findings underline the need for technology-based pedagogical innovations such as phoneme analysis applications, audio peer review, and the integration of phonological exercises in digital literacy tasks. Thus, generative phonology learning in the digital era must not only emphasise theoretical understanding of sound patterns, but also the students’ ability to reflect on, analyse, and correct their own pronunciation through interactive and adaptive digital media.

References

. F. (2020). Interference in English Language Learning Among Indonesia Students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.658636

Al-Hindadwi, F. H. (2018). The Basic Tenets of Generative Phonology. The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE), 9(1), 7–16. www.iiste.org

Alderete, J. (2020). Speech errors and phonological patterns: Insights from psycholinguistic and linguistic theory. Phonological Studies, 23(Dell), 70–20. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1520010380252165760

Asti, N. R., Ngazizah, N., & Ratnaningsih, A. (2024). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Muatan Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Hots Kelas V Sd Muhammadiyah Purwodadi. Journal Binagogik, 11(1), 189–194. https://ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.php/pgsd

Bartlett, A., & Hall, R. (2020). Pre-print version of Power. 100–128.

Buja, E. (2020). The treatment of final coda consonants in the acquisition of Romanian phonology.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 12(3), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp- 2020-0027

Cathrin Natalia Simarmata, Maikel Brekana Ginting, Putri Ayu Adelina Situmorang, & Windi Aura. (2025). VARIASI SUARA DALAM BAHASA GAUL: Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Fonologi Remaja. Journal Education and Government Wiyata, 3(1), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.71128/e-gov.v3i1.210

Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the Development of Prosodic Structure. Proceedings-Nels, 25, 13–26. http://www.cog.brown.edu/~demuth/articles/1995 Demuth Markedness.pdf

Dull, E., & Reinhardt, S. P. (2014). An analytic approach for discovery. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1304, pp. 89–92).

Edwards, J. G. H. (2021). Phonology and secomd language acquisition. Buku, 167–186.

Fathira, V., Masbiran, G., & Elsara, W. (2024). ELT-Lectura: Studies and Perspectives in English Language Enhancing Digital Literacy through the Role of YouTube in English Phonology Class: Students’ Perception. ELT-Lectura, 11(1).

Goldsmith, J. A., & Laks, B. (2023). Generative Phonology: its Origins, its Principles, and its Successors. The Cambridge History of Linguistics, 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511842788.035

Gowenlock, A. E., Norbury, C., & Rodd, J. M. (2024). Exposure to Language in Video and its Impact on Linguistic Development in Children Aged 3–11: A Scoping Review. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.385

Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 19(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106609-15

Harley, T. A. (2020). The study of language. The Psychology of Language, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782942-8

Harley, T. A. (2021). The study of language. The Psychology of Language, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315859019-9

Hidayah, N. (2024). INTERFERENSI FONOLOGI BAHASA MAKASSAR TERHADAP PENGUCAPAN BAHASA MANDARIN : STUDI KASUS 望加锡语音对普通话发音的干

扰: 个案研究 Wàng jiā xī yǔyīn duì pǔtōnghuà fāyīn de gānrǎo: Gè’àn yánjiū. Skripsi, 4(1), 9–15.

Khotimah, K., & Safirah, A. D. (2023). Integrasi Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Menganalisis Kesalahan Fonologis pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 3580–3592. http://j- innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/5298%0Ahttps://j- innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/download/5298/3726

Kim, H. (1995). Generating Interlanguage Syllabification in Optimality Theory ". English. Leung, C. B., & Brice, A. E. (2012). An Analysis of Phonological Processes Involved in Spoken English of Hong Kong Primary Pre-service Teachers. Language Testing in Asia, 2(2), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-2-42

M. Aurah, C. (2013). The Effects of Self-efficacy Beliefs and Metacognition on Academic Performance: A Mixed Method Study. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(8), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-8-11

Muhammad Suhil, & Mahruji Robiatu Romadoni. (2024). Analysis of EFL Student’s Pronunciation Errors: A Case Study of Two Adolescent Students. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.703

Ng, S. I., Ng, C. W. Y., Wang, J., & Lee, T. (2022). Automatic Detection of Speech Sound Disorder in Child Speech Using Posterior-based Speaker Representations. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, 2022-Septe(September), 2853–2857.https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2022-935

Pamungkas. (2021). Literasi Digital. In Perspektif (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://kitamenulis.id/2021/10/08/literasi-digital/

Rokhman, D. A. A. P. R., Busro, E. A. S., & Rani Setiawaty. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Tataran Fonologi Pada Karangan Narasi Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 1 Lau. Janacitta, 7(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.35473/jnct.v7i1.2876

Rusli, F. M. (2025). KAJIAN FONOLOGIS TERHADAP KEKELIRUAN PELAFALANF ONEM PADA SISWA SD TINGKAT AWAL. ELEMENTARY: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 285–295.

Salsabila, F. N., Agustina, Y., & Rachman, I. F. (2024). Literasi Digital : Peran Guru dan Pendidik dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Digital untuk Mencapai Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 1(5), 342–351.

Siti Nurhaliza, Rahma Ashari Hamzah, Nur Amna Febriyani, & Nurainun. (2024). Pengajaran Tata Bahasa dan Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 14(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpb.v14i2.2101

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sudha, R. (2017). Research Approaches and Designs. Research and Biostatistics for Nurses, 89–89. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/13016_6

Sukarno, S., & Jinabe, M. (2024). The Needs of English for Elementary School Students: from Family to School. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i1.67841

Sukses Pengajar, C., Dunia, S., Hamidah, H., Nelvi, E., Siagian, M., Ratni, L., Kharismawati, S., Gafur, A., Rivanti, A. N., Permata, C., Gita, S., Resticka, A., Yudistira, K., Nugraha, A., Machrus, K., Novietri, A., Ziani, P., Hanum, A., Yusuf, R., & Budiawan, S. (n.d.). Inovasi Pembelajaran BIPA: SEAMEO QITEP in Language.

Tremblay, J., Regnerus, M. D., Educação, S. D. A. S. N. D. E., Júnior, F. T., Sanfelice, J. L., Tavares Júnior, F., Dourado, L. F., Brito, M. M. A. de, Maiti, Bidinger, Sposito, M. P., Dubet, F. F., Ribeiro, C. A. C., Silva, N. do V., Barbosa, M. L. de O., Cunha, N. M., Dayrell, J., Rogošić, S., Baranović, B., … Alves, S. (2016). KESALAHAN FONOLOGIS DALAM PROSES DISKUSI SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Educacao e Sociedade, 1(1), 1689–1699. http://www.biblioteca.pucminas.br/teses/Educacao_PereiraAS_1.pdf%0Ahttp://www.anpocs.org.br/portal/publicacoes/rbcs_00_11/rbcs11_01.htm%0Ahttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/7845/1/td_2306.pdf%0Ahttps://direitoufma2010.files.wordpress.com/2010/

Wu, S., Ponti, E. M., & Cotterell, R. (2021). Differentiable Generative Phonology. September. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.05717

Zhang, Y. (2025). Impact of digital literacy on college students’ English proficiency: The mediating role of learning motivation and the moderating effect of technological self- efficacy. Acta Psychologica, 259(March), 105452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105452

Downloads

Published

16-12-2025

How to Cite

Pahmasari Harahap, D., Khasanah, S. U., & Ifrigil Firginia, P. (2025). Generative Phonology in the Digital Literacy Era: An Analysis of Elementary School Students Phonemic Errors in Educational Audio Production. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICHSS), 690–699. Retrieved from https://programdoktorpbiuns.org/index.php/proceedings/article/view/595