The #Niqabsquad Movement As Niqabis Activism For Openness Through Visual Cyberspace

Syarifah Nur Aini; Bintan Auliya Qurrota A‘yun

Authors

Syarifah Nur Aini Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Bintan Auliya Qurrota A‘yun Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Hukum, dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Digital Activism, Cadaris, Hashtag #niqabsquad

Abstract

By exploring the experiences of Muslim women who wear the niqab (veil) in Indonesia, this article explores the various aspects of their presence on social media, especially Instagram. Through the hashtag #niqabsquad, cadaris engage in digital activism, challenging societal perceptions and showing various sides of their lives. This paper explains how cadaris use Instagram as a platform for self-expression, community involvement, and even romantic relationships, challenging stereotypes and asserting their agency. The hashtag becomes a channel of solidarity and empowerment, allowing cadaris to explore virtual and physical realms while challenging prevailing ideologies. This research provides insight into the transformative potential of digital spaces for marginalized groups, providing a nuanced understanding of the nexus between identity, religiosity, and social media in contemporary contexts.

References

Altheide, D. L. (1984). Media Hegemony: A Failure of Perspective. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(2), 476–490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2749038.

Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the indignados in Spain. Information,

Communication & Society, 17(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360.

Breindl, Y., & Houghton, T. (2010). Techno-political activism as counterpublic spheres: discursive networking within deliberative transnational politics.

Bullock, K. H., & Jafri, G. J. (2000). Media (mis) representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation. Canadian Woman Studies/Les cahiers de la femme.

Choi, S., et al. (2020). A snap of your true self: How self-presentation and temporal affordance influence self-concept on social media. New Media & Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820977199.

Couldry, N., & Van, D. J. (2015). Researching social media as if the social mattered. Social Media + Society. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115604174.

Felski, R. (1989). Beyond Feminist Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80.

Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Hand, MM., Thomas D., Buboltz WC., Deemer ED., & Buyanjargal M. (2012). Facebook and romantic relationships: intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (1): 8-13. Doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0038.

Morey, P., & Yaqin, A. (2011). Framing Muslims: Stereotyping and representation after 9/11.

Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Hair, A. (2018). Fenomena Hijrah di Kalangan Anak Muda. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-3840983/fenomena-hijrah-di-kalangan-anak-muda

Hasan, N. (2016). Islam di Kota-Kota Menengah di Indonesia: Kelas Menengah, Gaya Hidup dan Demokrasi. In G. Van Klinken & W. Berenschot (Eds.), In Search of Middle

Indonesia: Kelas Menengah di Kota-Kota Menengah. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia dan KITLV- Jakarta.

Hirji, F. (2021). Claiming our space: Muslim women, activism, and social media. Islamophobia Studies Journal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/islastudj.6.1.0078.

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: a theory of the media as agents of religious change. North. Lights Film Media Stud. Yearb. 6 (1), 9–26.

Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: theorising religion, media and social change. Cult. Relig. 12 (2), 119–135.

Istiqomah, N. (2020). Pengungkapan Diri Dengan Dampak Memamerkan Kasih Sayang di Instagram. Psikoborneo J. Ilm. Psikol, 8(4), 709-717.

Joyce, M. (2010). Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change: New York: International Debate Education Association.

L€ovheim, M. (2014). Mediatization and religion. In: Lundby, K. (Ed.), Handbooks of Communication Science. De Gruyter.

Nisa, E. F. (2013). The internet subculture of Indonesian face-veiled women. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912474534.

O'Neill, B., et al. (2015). Freedom of religion, women's agency and banning the face veil: the

role of feminist beliefs in shaping women's opinion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(11), 1886-1901.https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.887744.

Obregón, R., & Tufte, T. (2017). Communication, social movements, and collective action: Toward a new research agenda in communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12332.

Olsson, E.K., & Eriksson, M., 2016. The logic of public organizations’ social media use: toward a theory of ‘social mediatization. Publ. Relat. Inquir. 5 (2), 187–204.

Palczewski, C. H. (2001). Cybermovements, new social movements and counterpublics. In:

Asen R and Brouwer D (eds) Counterpublics and the State. New York: SUNY Press.

Piela, A. (2014). Representations of niqabis in the British mass media. Public Spirit.

Piela, A. (2017). How do Muslim women who wear the niqab interact with others online? A case study of a profile on a photo-sharing website. new media & society, 19(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649919.

Pruzan-Jørgensen, J. (2012). Islamic women's activism in the Arab World. DIIS.

Rahman, R. Y., & Chatamallah, M. (2022, July). Makna Relationship bagi Muslimah Bercadar.

In Bandung Conference Series: Public Relations (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 531-539). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcspr.v2i2.3992

Rainie, L., et al. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Vol. 19Pew Internet &

American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old- media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement_PDF.pdf.

Schradie, J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx042.

Shofa, F., & Astri Utami, M. (2017). Menyingkap Makna dan Tanda dalam Iklan Rokok A-Mild Versi “Hasrat”: Kajian Semiotika. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 6(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v6i2.266

Stoddart, M. C. (2007). Ideology, hegemony, discourse: A critical review of theories of knowledge and power. Social Thought & Research, 191-225.

Sujon, Z., & Dyer, H. T. (2020). Understanding the social in a digital age. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1125-1134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912531

Tarlo, E. (2007). Hidden Features of the Face Veil Contro ers.,(1), 24-25. https://hdl. handle. net/1887/17112.

Van D. J.,& Poell, T., (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media Commun. 1 (1), 2–14.

Vincent, E.A. (2016) Social media as an avenue to achieving sense of belonging among college students. VISTAS Online. https://www.counseling.org/docs/default- source/vistas/social-media-as-an-avenue.pdf?sfvrsn=8

Wati, S., et al. (2022). Religion on Millennials: Phenomenon of Hijra and Changes in Islamic Landscape in Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(1), 47-64.

https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i1.709.

Whiteman, H. (2015). Social media: how does it affect our mental health and well-being?. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/275361.php

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 16(4): 362–369.

Vaast, E., et al. (2017). Social media affordances for connective action - an examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1179– 1205.

http://www.misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/Abstracts/13047_RA_VaastAbstr act.pdf.

Zhu, Q., et al. (2017). “I Shield Myself from Thee: Selective Avoidance on Social Media during Political Protests,” Political Communication 34(1): 112–131. 69