Evaluation Of Metal Craft Teaching Factory (Tefa) Program At SMK N 5 Yogyakarta

Septiana Wahyuningsih

Authors

Septiana Wahyuningsih Yogyakarta State University

Keywords:

Evaluation, Teaching Factory, CIPP

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the suitability of the implementation of the Teaching Factory (TEFA) program in production and business-based learning carried out in improving the business and industrial world at SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta by using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). This study uses percentage descriptive data analysis, using data collected in the form of observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The results of the research on the implementation of the Teaching Factory program obtained criteria according to an average percentage of 78.77%, with context criteria of 90%, input 73.33%, process 72%, and product 72%. In order for the goals of Teaching Factory to run smoothly and in accordance with the goals of TEFA, teachers make efforts to increase learning from the obstacles encountered in the process of implementing TEFA so that graduates have competent standards in the business and industrial world.

References

Alptekin, S., Pouraghabagher, R., McQuaid, P., & Waldorf, D. (2001, June). Teaching factory. In 2001 Annual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/1-2—9863

Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The teaching factory: a manufacturing education paradigm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009

Febriana, R. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Gatiningsih, Widya. (2020). Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Sistem Blok pada Pembelajaran Teaching Factory di SMK. Jurnal Tata Busana Universitas Negeri Surabaya. DOI: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-tata-busana/issue/view/2230.

Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029

Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2018). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation. SAGE publications.

Guba, E. G. (1970). Evaluation as a Decision-Making Tool. Speech Given at Audio Visual Indianan University.

Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The teaching factory paradigm: Developments and outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2009). Implementing 4 levels: A effective evaluation of training programs: Easyread super large 24pt edition.

Maulina, M. M., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Optimalisasi Link & Match dalam Upaya Relevansi SMK dengan DUDI. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v10i1.48008

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data on analysis: New methods of sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: SageMavrikios, D.

Perdana, N. S. (2019). Analisis Permintaan & Penawaran Lulusan SMK pada Pasar Tenaga Kerja. Refleksi Edukatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v9i2.2948

Phillips, D. C. (2018). The Many Functions of Evaluation in Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(46). DOI: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176523

Rohmah, W., Sari, D. E., & Wulansari, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Teaching Factory SMK N 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial

Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis. Research in nursing & health, 18(4), 371-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411

Scriven, M. (2000). Evaluation ideologies. In Evaluation models. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47559-6_15

Silalahi, T. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yayasan Kita Menulis: Medan

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.3

Stufflebeam, D. L., Madam, C. F., Kellaghan, T. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 279-317). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI : 10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 117-141). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI : 10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16

Supriyantoko, I., Jaya, A., Kurnia, V., & Habiba, P. G. S. (2020). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan teaching factory model evaluasi CIPP di SMK Negeri DKI Jakarta. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education (JVTE). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jvte.v2n2.p1-10

Rosina, H., Virgantina, V., Ayyash, Y., Dwiyanti, V., & Boonsong, S. (2021). Vocational education curriculum: Between vocational education and industrial needs. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v1i1.887

Nicholson, T. (1989). Using the CIPP model to evaluate reading instruction. Journal of Reading. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44416841

Widiatna, A. D. (2019). Teaching factory. Pustaka Kaji: Jakarta Timur

Wijaya, M. O., & Utami, E. D. (2021). Pengangguran Lulusan SMK pada Tahun 2020. Seminar Nasional Statistik. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2021i1.1048

Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines, 2.

Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake's countenance model. Evaluating an environmental education professional department.