An Analysis Of The Use Of Tenses On English Abstract
Keywords:
Analysis, Tenses, AbstractAbstract
Most of national journals using Indonesia language in the articles have a requirement to write an abstract in two languages; Indonesia and English. Writing an English abstract should apply a correct tenses. Some people believe that writing an English abstract uses present (both simple present and present perfect) and past (both simple past and past perfect tense) tense. The study aimed to analyze the use of tenses on English abstract published in Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan (JITK). It was a qualitative research with descriptive method. The population was 176 documents, however, by checking the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the sample were 40 English abstracts. The data were collected by the observation and note technique by Mahsun. Furthermore, those were analyzed by triangualtion analysis. The research result showed that there were five tenses used in the English abstracts; simple present tense, simple past tense, simple future tense, present perfect tense, and past perfect tense. Those were differently written in each component of abstract. Based on the result, it can be conclude that the English abstracts uses different tenses in each component of abstracts. Therefore, to make the similarity of the use of tenses in each component of abstract, it should be informed about the exact tenses used in writing an English abstract.
References
Aharony, N. (2016). Relationships among attachment theory, social capital perspective, personality characteristics, and Facebook self-disclosure. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(3), 362–386.
Ardi, R., & Maison, D. (2014). How do Polish and Indonesian disclose in Facebook?: Differences in online self-disclosure, need for popularity, need to belong and self-esteem. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12(3), 195–218.
Azkiya Karima, A. (2019). Toxic Online Disinhibition Effect: Sebuah Studi Literatur Terkait Faktor - Faktor yang Mempengaruhi, Perilaku yang Didorong, dan Strategi yang Menangani Dampaknya = Toxic Online Disinhibition Effect: Literature Review on Influencing Factors, Encouraged Behaviors, and Strategies for Dealing with Impacts. Universitas Indonesia Library.
Bargh, J., McKenna, K., & Fitzsimons, G. (2002). Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the “True Self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues - J SOC ISSUES, 58, 33–48.
Bazarova, N. (Natalie), & Choi, Y. (2014). Self‐Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites[An earlier]. Journal of Communication, 64.
Bulan, M. A. I. C., & Wulandari, P. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Kontrol Diri Terhadap Kecenderungan Perilaku Cyberbullying Pada Remaja Pengguna Media Sosial Anonim. Buletin Riset Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (BRPKM), 1(1), Art. 1.
Chen, W., Xie, X.-C., Ping, F., & Wang, M.-Z. (2017). Personality differences in online and offline self-disclosure preference among adolescents: A person-oriented approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 175–178.
Cheung, C., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence. Internet Research, 25(2), 279–299.
Chibuwe, A., Mpofu, P., & Bhowa, K. (2021). Naming the Ghost: Self-Naming, Pseudonyms, and Identities of Phantoms on Zimbabwean Twitter. Social Media + Society, 7(3), 20563051211035696.
Farikhah, L. (2021). Pengaruh kecerdasan emosi dan online disinhibition effect terhadap perilaku cyberbullying pada mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi angkatan 2017 & 2018 UIN Malang [Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim].
Fathonah, S., Nursanti, S., & Tayo, Y. (2022). Hambatan Komunikasi Antarpribadi Mengenai Keterbukaan Diri pada Pengguna Akun Pseudonim (Cyber Account) di Media Twitter. Jurnal Publisitas, 9(1), 17–28.
Hamzah, R. E., & Putri, C. E. (2020). ANALISIS SELF-DISCLOSURE PADA FENOMENA HYPERHONEST
DI MEDIA SOSIAL. Jurnal Pustaka Komunikasi, 3(2), Art. 2.
Hasfi, N., Usmand, S., & Santoso, H. P. (2017). Anonimitas di Media Sosial: Sarana Kebebasan Berekspresi atau Patologi Demokrasi? Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 28.
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Everett, M. K. (2013). The Effects of Anonymity on Self-Disclosure in Blogs: An Application of the Online Disinhibition Effect: Anonymity and self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283–302.
Lin, H., Tov, W., & Qiu, L. (2014). Emotional disclosure on social networking sites: The role of network structure and psychological needs. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 342–350.
Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing Online and Offline Self-Disclosure: A Systematic Review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111.
Nugraha, R., Rahmani, K., Indrianie, E., & Aliifah, D. (2022). Hubungan antara Self-Concept dan Toxic Disinhibition Online Effect pada Mahasiswa yang Menggunakan Media Sosial Instagram. Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi), 6, 37–48.
Nugrahani, A. D. (2021). Hubungan antara Anonimitas dengan Self-Disclosure pada Pengguna Twitter. Buletin Riset Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental (BRPKM), 1(2), Art. 2.
Ostendorf, S., Meier, Y., & Brand, M. (2022). Self-disclosure on social networks: More than a rational decision-making process. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(4), Art. 4.
Peddinti, S. T., Ross, K. W., & Cappos, J. (2014). “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”: A twitter case study of anonymity in social networks. Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Online social networks, 83–94.
Peddinti, S. T., Ross, K. W., & Cappos, J. (2017). User Anonymity on Twitter. IEEE Security & Privacy, 15(3), 84–87.
Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and Self-Disclosure on Weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451.
Rhosyidah, K. (2015). Pengaruh keterbukaan diri (self disclosure) terhadap keterampilan komunikasi interpersonal menantu perempuan pada ibu mertua di daerah Karanganyar Probolinggo [Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim].
Ruliyatin, E., & Ridhowati, D. (2021). DAMPAK CYBER BULLYING PADA PRIBADI SISWA DAN PENANGANANNYA DI ERA PANDEMI COVID-19. Bikotetik (Bimbingan dan Konseling Teori dan Praktik), 5(1), 1.
Sari, D. P. (2018). PEMBUKAAN DIRI SECARA ONLINE (ONLINE SELF-DISCLOSURE) REMAJA GENERASI Z. 22(1), 7.
Shafie, L., Nayan, S., & Osman, N. (2012). Constructing Identity through Facebook Profiles: Online Identity and Visual Impression Management of University Students in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 134–140.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 7(3), 321–326.
Taddicken, M. (2014). The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248–273.
Tominaga, T., Hijikata, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2018). How self-disclosure in Twitter profiles relate to anonymity consciousness and usage objectives: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 391–435.
Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(1).
Zhao, D., & Rosson, M. B. (2009, Januari 1). How and Why People Twitter: The Role that Micro-blogging Plays in Informal Communication at Work. GROUP’09 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Supporting Group Work.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
